COSP collections

COSP, the College of Stoic Philosophers

COSP publishes the eJournal, rare books, and the permanent collection.

Every excerpt shows its page. The source, document type, and usage rights remain visible.

Provenance preserved

Visit COSP site

The Stoic Philosophy

Availability
Text available
Text quality
Automatic checks passed
Text format
Digital text extracted from the document
Document type
Scholarly study
Usage rights
Public domain
Excerpts
59

page 19

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
not

know

of

any system

that

15

But

is.

I

believe that it represents a way of looking at

the world and the practical problems of

which possesses
for the

still

a permanent

life

interest

human race, and a permanent power

of inspiration.

I

shall approach it, therefore,

rather as a psychologist than as a philosopher

or historian.

I

shall not attempt to trace the

growth or variation of Stoic doctrine under
its

various professors, nor yet to scrutinize

the logical validity of its arguments.

I

shall

merely try as best I can to make intelligible
its

great central

principles

and the almost

irresistible appeal which they made to so many

of the best minds of antiquity.

From this point of view I will begin by a
very rough general

suggestion

the religions known to history

viz.,

fall

into

that

two

broad classes, religions which are suited for
times

of

good

government

and

religions

which are suited for times of bad government

;

page 20

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

16

or

for

religions

for

religions

which accept the world or which

prosperity

adversity,

defy the world, which place their hopes in
the betterment of human life on this earth or

which look away from

By

tears.
I

"the

it

as from a vale of
in

world"

this

connection

mean the ordinary concrete world, the well-

known companion of the flesh and the Devil
not the universe.

;

For some of the religions

which think most meanly of the world they

know have a profound admiration for all, or
nearly all, those parts of the universe where

they have not been.

Now, to be really successful in the struggle
for existence, a religion

of circumstances.
adversity,

;

sets

A religion which fails in

which deserts you just when the

world deserts you,
affair

must suit both

would be a very poor

on the other hand, it is almost equally

fatal for a religion to collapse as soon

successful.

Stoicism, like

as

Christianity,

it

is

was

page 21

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
primarily a religion

for

the

and defiance

religion of defence

a

oppressed,
but,

;

like

had the requisite power of

Christianity,

it

adaptation.

Consistently or inconsistently,

it

opened its wings to embrace the needs both

of success and of failure.
I

To illustrate what

mean- contrast for a moment the

an active,

practical,

life

of

modern

philanthropic,

Bishop with that of an anchorite

like

Simeon

and filth

Stylites, living in idleness

on the top of a large column

;

or,

St.

again,

contrast the Bishop s ideals with those of the

author of the Apocalypse, abandoning himself
to visions of

a gorgeous reversal of the order

of this evil world
of the blessed.
tians

;

and the bloody revenges

All three are devout Chris

but the Bishop

is

working with the

world of men, seeking its welfare and help
ing

its

practical

needs

rejecting or cursing

same way we shall

;

the other

two are

In

somewhat the

find that

our two chief

it.

c

page 22

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

i8

preachers of Stoicism are, the one a lame

and penniless slave to whom worldly success
is as

nothing, the other an Emperor of Rome,

keenly interested in good administration.

The founder

of

the

Stoic

school,

Zeno,

came from Cilicia to Athens about the year
320 B.C.

His place of birth is, perhaps, signi

ficant.

He was a Semite, and came from the

East.

The Semite was apt in his religion to

be fierier and more uncompromizing than the

Greek.

The time

significant.

of his

coming is certainly
It was a time when landmarks

had collapsed, and human life was left, as it
seemed, without a guide.
in

Greece of the

fifth

The average man

century B.C. had two

main guides and sanctions for his conduct of
life :

the welfare of his City and the laws and

traditions of his ancestors.

and next the traditional

First the

religion

;

fourth century both of these had fallen.

us see how.

City,

and in the
Let

page 23

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
Devotion

the

19

or

Community
The
produced a religion of public service.
to

City

City represented a high ideal, and

it

sented supreme

B.C.

supreme

power.

By

had

been

power

Athens, and

all

320

repre
the

overthrown.

independent Greek

cities,

had fallen before the overwhelming force of
the great military monarchies of Alexander

and

his

The high

generals.

same time was seen

community
himself,

to

be

to

ideal

the

at

narrow.

The

which a man should devote

he should devote himself at

if

all,

must surely be something larger than one
of these walled cities set
hills.

Now when the Jews lost

Holy City they had

that they

still,

had still, a guide left.

taken from
"

their separate

Thus the City, as a guide of life, had

proved wanting.
their

upon

us,"

says the

Book

or believed
"Zion

is

of Esdras

;

nothing is left save the Holy One and His

Law."

But Greece had no such Law.

The

page 24

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
Greek

religious

had

tradition

been riddled with criticism.

long

since

would not

It

bear thinking out, and the Greeks liked to

The

think things out.
fell

traditional

religion

not because the people were degenerate.

Quite the contrary

it

;

fell,

as

has some

it

times fallen elsewhere, because the people were

The people had advanced, and

progressive.

the traditional religion had not kept pace with

them.
tion.

And we may add another considera
If the

themselves

Gods

of tradition

capable

of

had proved
their

protecting

worshippers, doubtless their many moral and
intellectual

overlooked.

deficiencies

might

have

But they had not.

proved no match

for

been

They had

Alexander

and

the

Macedonian phalanx.

Thus the work that lay before the genera
tion of

320 B.C. was twofold.

rebuild a

They had

new public spirit, devoted

the City, but to something greater

;

to

not to

and they

page 25

\x
THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

21

had to rebuild a religion or philosophy which
should be a safe guide in the threatening
chaos.

We will see how Zeno girded him

self to this task.

Two questions lay before him
and what_to believe.
in the first,

but

it

His
could

real

real or unreal,

it

was

For if we do

true or untrue,

is

we cannot form any reliable

rules about conduct or

as

interest

not be answered

without first facing the second.
not in the least know what

how to live

anything

else.

And,

happened, the Sceptical school of phi

losophy, largely helped by Plato, had lately

been active

in

denying

the

possibility

of

human knowledge and throwing doubt on the
very existence of reality.

Their arguments

were extraordinarily good, and many of them

have not been answered yet

;

they affect both

the credibility of the senses and the supposed

laws of reasoning.

The Sceptics showed how

the senses are notoriously fallible and con-

page 26

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

22

tradictory,

and how the laws of reasoning

lead by equally correct processes to opposite

Many modern

conclusions.

philosophers,

from Kant to Dr. Schiller and Mr. Bertrand
Russell, have
footsteps.

followed

respectfully in their

But Zeno had no patience with this

sort of thing.

He wanted to get to business.

Also he was a born

fighter.

His dealings

who argued against him
always remind me of a story told of the
Duke of Wellington when his word was

with

opponents

The Duke, when

doubted by a subaltern.

he was very old and incredibly distinguished,

was telling how once, at mess in the Penin
sula, his servant had opened a bottle of port,

and inside found a rat.
a very large

bottle,"

"It

must have been

remarked the subaltern.

The Duke fixed him with his eye.
a

damned small

subaltern, abashed

a very small

bottle."

"

;

"

rat."

"Oh,"

"

said

then no doubt

It

It was

it

the

was

was a damned large

page 27

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
rat,"

And

the Duke.

said

23

there the matter

has rested ever since.

Zeno began by asserting the existence ot
the

real
"

real ?

world.

"

What do you mean by

asked the Sceptic.

material.

I
"

matter."

mean

"

mean solid and

I

that this

table

solid

is

And God," said the Sceptic,

"

and

Are they solid matter?"
Per
"more solid, if
fectly solid," says Zeno
any
the soul?

"

;

thing, than the table."

virtue or justice

"And

or the Rule of Three; also solid
"

is

Of course," said Zeno

matter?"

"

;

quite solid."

what may be called "high doctrine," and

Zeno s successors eventually explained
their master did not really

was
"

This

solid

matter, but that

that

mean that justice
it

was a sort of

tension, "or mutual relation, among material

objects.
situation.

This amendment saves the whole

But

it

is

well

to

remember the

uncompromising materialism from which the
Stoic system started.

page 28

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

24

Now we can get a step further.
world

is

real,

If

the

how do we know about

it ?

By the evidence of our senses

;

for the sense-

impression (here Stoics and Epicureans both
followed the fifth-century physicists) is simply
the imprint of the real thing

upon our mind-

As such it must be true.

stuff.

exceptional cases where

senses

deceive

us

In the few

we say

we speak

"

that

"our

incorrectly.

The sense-impression was all right

;

is

it

we

who have interpreted it wrongly, or received
in

it

in

some incomplete way.

each

case

impression."

is

impression which

we

sense-

comprehensive

think

I

it

means a sense-

"

"grasps

be one which

"grasp,"

What we need

The meaning of this phrase is

not quite clear.

may

a

"

its
"

"

grasps

object
us, or

so that we cannot doubt

;

but it

which
it.

In

any case, when we get the real imprint of the
object upon our senses, then this imprint
of necessity

true.

is

When the Sceptics talk

page 29

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY

25

about a conjurer making "our senses deceive
us,"

or when they object that a straight stick

put half under water looks as if it were bent

such cases the impression
it

is

is

the interrjretation that

is

when they argue
because men

fallacious

perfectly true

;

may gQ.jwrong.

-.

Similarly,

In

they are talking inexactly.

in the middle,

that

reasoning

habitually

make

mistakes in it, they are confusing the laws of

reasoning with the inexact use which people

make of them.
that twice

two

You might just as well say
is

not four, or that 7 x 7

not 49, because people often

is

make mistakes

in doing arithmetic.

Thus we obtain a world which is in the first
place real and in the second knowable.

Now

we can get to work on our real philosophy,
our doctrine of ethics and conduct.

And we

upon a very simple principle,

build

it

down

first

by

Zeno s

master,

founder of the Cynic School

:

Crates,

laid

the

the principle

page 30

THE STOIC PHILOSOPHY
that

That

Nothing but Goodness is Good.

seems plain enough, and harmless enough
and so does its corollary
ness

is

:

you call "good,"

clear that

it

is

goodness

in

it.

;

Nothing but bad

In the case of

bad."

object which

"

any concrete
it seems quite

only good because of some

We,

perhaps,

should

not

express the matter in quite this way, but we

should scarcely think it worth while to object

Zeno chooses to phrase it so, especially as

if

the statement itself seems

little

better than a

truism.

Now, to an ancient Greek the form of the
phrase was quite familiar. He was accus
tomed to asking
to

"

What is the good

?"

It was

him the central problem of conduct.

meant

"

:

It

What is the object of life, or the

element in things which makes them worth
having?"
"

Thus

the

principle will

Nothing is worth living

ness."

for

mean:

except good

The only good for man is to be good.