Potentially copyrighted passage By consulting this text, you confirm that you may use it for personal and educational purposes. Do not reproduce its content. If the book helps you, buy it to support the author or rights holders.

Aristotle

Rhetoric Section 39

Section 329 of 882

Canonical reference 1.9.39

Ancient Greek

πίπτει δʼ εὐλόγως ἡ αὔξησις εἰς τοὺς ἐπαίνους· ἐν ὑπεροχῇ γάρ ἐστιν, ἡ δʼ ὑπεροχὴ τῶν καλῶν· διὸ κἂν μὴ πρὸς τοὺς ἐνδόξους, ἀλλὰ πρὸς τοὺς ἄλλους δεῖ παραβάλλειν, ἐπείπερ ἡ ὑπεροχὴ δοκεῖ μηνύειν ἀρετήν.

English

J. H. Freese, 1926

Amplification is with good reason ranked as one of the forms of praise, since it consists in superiority, and superiority is one of the things that are noble. That is why, if you cannot compare him with illustrious personages, you must compare him with ordinary persons, since superiority is thought to indicate virtue.

French AI-generated translation, non-official

Codex gpt-5.6-sol · Non-official working translation · 2026-09-13

C’est à juste titre que l’amplification est rangée parmi les formes de la louange, puisqu’elle consiste dans la supériorité, et que la supériorité compte parmi les choses nobles. Voilà pourquoi, si vous ne pouvez comparer un homme à des personnages illustres, vous devez le comparer à des personnes ordinaires, puisque la supériorité est tenue pour un signe de vertu.

Concepts in this passage

Before reading

What you will learn

Open the full record