Moral Letters to Lucilius Section 6

Honesta, inquit, res est laeta paupertas. Illa vero non est paupertas, si laeta est. Non qui parum habet, sed qui plus cupit, pauper est. Quid enim refert, quantum illi in arca, quantum in horreis iaceat, quantum pascat aut feneret, si alieno inminet, si non adquisita sed adquirenda computat? Quis sit divitiarum modus, quaeris? Primus habere quod necesse est, proximus quod sat est. Vale.

« La belle chose, s’écrie-t-il, que le contentement dans la pauvreté ! » Mais il n’y a plus pauvreté, s’il y a contentement. Ce n’est point d’avoir peu, c’est de désirer plus, qu’on est pauvre. Qu’importe combien cet homme a dans ses coffres, combien dans ses greniers, ce qu’il engraisse de troupeaux, ce qu’il touche d’intérêts, s’il dévore en espoir le bien d’autrui, s’il suppute non ce qu’il a acquis, mais ce qu’il voudrait acquérir ! « Quelle est la mesure de la richesse ? » diras-tu. D’abord le nécessaire, ensuite ce dont on se contente.

He says: “Contented poverty is an honourable estate.” Indeed, if it be contented, it is not poverty at all. It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, that is poor. What does it matter how much a man has laid up in his safe, or in his warehouse, how large are his flocks and how fat his dividends, if he covets his neighbour’s property, and reckons, not his past gains, but his hopes of gains to come? Do you ask what is the proper limit to wealth? It is, first, to have what is necessary, and, second, to have what is enough. Farewell.