Moral Letters to Lucilius Section 32

Potest quidem etiam illud dici: sine liberalibus studiis veniri ad sapientiam posse; quamvis enim virtus discenda sit, tamen non per haec discitur. Quid est autem, quare existimem non futurum sapientem eum, qui litteras nescit, cum sapientia non sit in litteris? Res tradit, non verba, et nescio an certior memoria sit, quae nullum extra se subsidium habet.

On peut même dire qu’il n’est pas besoin d’arts libéraux pour arriver à la sagesse : car quoiqu’il faille apprendre la vertu, ce n’est point par eux qu’on l’apprend. Et pourquoi m’imaginerais-je qu’on ne peut devenir sage si l’on est illettré, puisque la sagesse ne réside pas dans les lettres ? Elle enseigne des choses, non des mots ; et je ne sais si la mémoire n’est pas plus sûre quand elle ne s’aide d’aucun secours extérieur.

We might even make the statement that it is possible to attain wisdom without the “liberal studies”; for although virtue is a thing that must be learned, yet it is not learned by means of these studies. What reason have I, however, for supposing that one who is ignorant of letters will never be a wise man, since wisdom is not to be found in letters? Wisdom communicates facts and not words; and it may be true that the memory is more to be depended upon when it has no support outside itself.